Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the additional burdens experienced by Texas abortion patients whose nearest in-state clinic was one of more than half of facilities providing abortion that had closed after the introduction of House Bill 2 in 2013. METHODS In mid-2014, we surveyed Texas-resident women seeking abortions in 10 Texas facilities (n = 398), including both Planned Parenthood-affiliated clinics and independent providers that performed more than 1500 abortions in 2013 and provided procedures up to a gestational age of at least 14 weeks from last menstrual period. We compared indicators of burden for women whose nearest clinic in 2013 closed and those whose nearest clinic remained open. RESULTS For women whose nearest clinic closed (38%), the mean one-way distance traveled was 85 miles, compared with 22 miles for women whose nearest clinic remained open (P ≤ .001). After adjustment, more women whose nearest clinic closed traveled more than 50 miles (44% vs 10%), had out-of-pocket expenses greater than $100 (32% vs 20%), had a frustrated demand for medication abortion (37% vs 22%), and reported that it was somewhat or very hard to get to the clinic (36% vs 18%; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Clinic closures after House Bill 2 resulted in significant burdens for women able to obtain care.
منابع مشابه
Women’s Experience Obtaining Abortion Care in Texas after Implementation of Restrictive Abortion Laws: A Qualitative Study
BACKGROUND In November 2013, Texas implemented three abortion restrictions included in House Bill 2 (HB 2). Within six months, the number of facilities providing abortion decreased by almost half, and the remaining facilities were concentrated in large urban centers. The number of medication abortions decreased by 70% compared to the same period one year prior due to restrictions on this method...
متن کاملChange in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas.
OBJECTIVES In 2013, Texas passed omnibus legislation restricting abortion services. Provisions restricting medical abortion, banning most procedures after 20 weeks and requiring physicians to have hospital-admitting privileges were enforced in November 2013; by September 2014, abortion facilities must meet the requirements of ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). We aimed to rapidly assess the ch...
متن کاملHow Far Is Too Far? New Evidence on Abortion Clinic Closures, Access, and Abortions
We estimate the effects of abortion-clinic closures on clinic access and abortions using variation generated by Texas HB2, a “TRAP” law that shuttered nearly half of Texas’ abortion clinics in late 2013. Our results suggest a substantial and non-linear effect of distance to clinics. Increases from less than 50 miles to 50–100, 100–150, and 150–200 miles reduce abortion rates by 15, 25, and 40 p...
متن کاملThe Impacts of Restricted Access to Abortion and Family Planning Services: Evidence from Clinic Closures in Texas
Access to abortion and publicly funded family planning services in the U.S. has declined considerably over the past five years. We separately identify the impacts of restricted access to abortion clinics and non-abortion family planning clinics on reproductive behavior using data on abortions, births, and contraceptive purchases. Variation in clinic access comes from three pieces of legislation...
متن کاملWomen's Knowledge of and Support for Abortion Restrictions in Texas: Findings from a Statewide Representative Survey.
CONTEXT States have passed numerous laws restricting abortion, and Texas passed some of the most restrictive legislation between 2011 and 2013. Information about women's awareness of and support for the laws' provisions could inform future debates regarding abortion legislation. METHODS Between December 2014 and January 2015, some 779 women aged 18-49 participated in an online, statewide repr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- American journal of public health
دوره 106 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016